<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantic Search: If you can&#8217;t explain it in simple terms it has no immediate value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/marketing/semantic-search-if-you-cant-explain-it-in-simple-terms-it-has-no-immediate-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/marketing/semantic-search-if-you-cant-explain-it-in-simple-terms-it-has-no-immediate-value/</link>
	<description>Domaining, monetization strategies, search marketing and Internet entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:39:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Kass</title>
		<link>http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/marketing/semantic-search-if-you-cant-explain-it-in-simple-terms-it-has-no-immediate-value/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Kass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/communication/semantic-search-if-you-cant-explain-it-in-simple-terms-it-has-no-immediate-value/#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>Techies explain tech in a technical way :) I guess thats why they don&#039;t have social life? ;)
the simple way to put their explanation in words is this..

If we could place &quot;things&quot; (like web pages, or simple answers to questions) on a map (like the world map), where the location would be basically their &quot;meaning&quot; (what the post calls &quot;points in the conceptual space&quot;).. then two things with the same meaning would be closer to eachother.. like two neighboring countries.
The closer two &quot;things&quot; are, the more relevant they are (conceptually closer).

So the idea here is to place &quot;things&quot; on a &quot;map&quot; where &quot;distances&quot; can be measures.

The tricky thing here is defining a &quot;map&quot; with its rules and measurements that actually have any coherent meaning to base the claim that &quot;closer&quot; means something real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techies explain tech in a technical way <img src='http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I guess thats why they don&#8217;t have social life? <img src='http://blog.supernaturalagency.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
the simple way to put their explanation in words is this..</p>
<p>If we could place &#8220;things&#8221; (like web pages, or simple answers to questions) on a map (like the world map), where the location would be basically their &#8220;meaning&#8221; (what the post calls &#8220;points in the conceptual space&#8221;).. then two things with the same meaning would be closer to eachother.. like two neighboring countries.<br />
The closer two &#8220;things&#8221; are, the more relevant they are (conceptually closer).</p>
<p>So the idea here is to place &#8220;things&#8221; on a &#8220;map&#8221; where &#8220;distances&#8221; can be measures.</p>
<p>The tricky thing here is defining a &#8220;map&#8221; with its rules and measurements that actually have any coherent meaning to base the claim that &#8220;closer&#8221; means something real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
